This was replaced by the EU Law (Withdrawal Agreement) 2019-20, introduced in the House of Commons and passed at first reading on 29 December 2019. Parliament has taken a historic step towards leaving the European Union and backed Boris Johnson`s Brexit law by a 124-vote majority, a week after the Conservatives won a landslide victory in the general election. Friday`s vote focused on the second reading of the law, in which MPs will vote on whether they were in principle ready to pass a bill. Changes can be made at later stages. Asa Bennett of the Telegraph tweeted some photos of the Prime Minister who signed copies of the withdrawal agreement for MPs: What makes a difference for a year: the withdrawal bill passes second reading 358 to 234 – resounding cheers on the Tory benches Wednesday, the House of Commons rejected the five amendments with large margins in separate votes and sent the bill back to the original House of Lords. It could have started with a parliamentary ping-pong game where other versions of the law went back and forth between the two houses, until they agreed on a version. But faced with the Conservatives` 80-seat majority in the House of Commons, the House of Lords accepted and approved the bill yesterday in its original form without a vote. The firm`s investigation revealed that during the London Mansion House incident in June, he had to make a “second division decision” and that he had “the option of simply blocking their path.” The House of Commons supported an earlier bill at second reading in October; but rejected the Prime Minister`s plan to bring him down by Parliament within days, prompting him to push for parliamentary elections. This is a good time to talk to another explanatory point about what happens after the Brexit Act is passed.
(Spoiler alert – Brexit is not done.) MPs are now voting on the request for a programme that sets the timetable for parliament`s submission of the legislation by 31 January. South Shields MP Emma Lewell-Buck, one of six Labour MPs who wanted to vote in favour of the bill, said it was time to end “opposition to the opposition.” After passing its second reading by a sovereign 358 votes to 234, the withdrawal agreement is on track to complete its adoption by both houses of Parliament in time for Brexit to take place at the end of January. Read our story on the passage of the Second Reading Withdrawal Treaty Act here. Heather Stewart, political editor of the Guardian, writes that the House of Lords, which must approve all laws, tends to pay particular attention to aspects of bills relating to rights and cases relating to the courts, the judiciary and political institutions in the United Kingdom. With different support, the House of Lords on Monday and Tuesday passed five amendments that would give EU citizens the right to remain in the UK without having to ask for that right and give them documentary proof of the law; a second that deprives ministers of the power to decide which decisions of the European Court of Justice could be flouted or overturned; a third, which annulled the independence of the British courts with regard to EU jurisprudence; a fourth, proposed by Lord Alfred Dubs, who arrived from Czechoslovakia in 1939 as a child, fleeing persecution of Jews after the seizure of power in Germany, which would reunite refugee children with their families; and a fifth, which took note of the Sewel Convention, under which Parliament should not legislate on decentralised issues without the agreement of the decentralised institutions.